I would pay real money to see this. Of course, Carney would fail spectacularly at the first hurdle. He's tackled this topic in his horror fantasy, "Values."
Also, you'd need six hours for that man. His "uh and umm" counters run at ten per minute, near as I can tell.
Poilievre, on the other hand, shines in the long form interview. I wish he'd done more of them in the last year. Whether you like his policy or not, it's inarguable that he's far more well versed on the real issues, and has developed real idea to tackle the unholy mess we are mired in.
Truly excellent set of questions. I really like the idea of the set-up as well - a challenging conversation between 3 adults which would demand actual discussion vs. speechifying in front of an audience which will just encourage playing to the gallery. Your insistence that questions *actually be answered* in a substantive, detailed way would be by far the best innovation compared to talking points and pivoting to preferred messages that we can look forward to under the current system.
Maybe you should run in politics. You would outshine 95% of the present ones at present.
Yes this could be a real debate - imagine that.
I would pay real money to see this. Of course, Carney would fail spectacularly at the first hurdle. He's tackled this topic in his horror fantasy, "Values."
Also, you'd need six hours for that man. His "uh and umm" counters run at ten per minute, near as I can tell.
Poilievre, on the other hand, shines in the long form interview. I wish he'd done more of them in the last year. Whether you like his policy or not, it's inarguable that he's far more well versed on the real issues, and has developed real idea to tackle the unholy mess we are mired in.
Real questions but they’ll never even get asked I’m quite confident of that!
Truly excellent set of questions. I really like the idea of the set-up as well - a challenging conversation between 3 adults which would demand actual discussion vs. speechifying in front of an audience which will just encourage playing to the gallery. Your insistence that questions *actually be answered* in a substantive, detailed way would be by far the best innovation compared to talking points and pivoting to preferred messages that we can look forward to under the current system.
Well done. If only there could be such a debate.